You are the Chief Speaker in a debate on the to... - SS1 English Composition : Debates Question

Goodday, everyone. I am here today to speak against the motion that violent video games should be banned.

I believe that violent video games are not a cause of violence. In fact, there is no scientific evidence to support this claim.

Studies have shown that violent video games can actually have a positive impact on players. For example, they can help players to improve their hand-eye coordination and their problem-solving skills.

Violent video games can also be a way for players to express themselves and to explore different emotions. For example, a player might play a violent video game to work through anger or frustration.

Of course, there are some people who are more susceptible to the negative effects of violent video games. For example, people who are already violent or who have mental health problems might be more likely to be affected by violent video games.

However, this does not mean that violent video games should be banned for everyone. Instead, we should focus on helping people who are at risk of being affected by violent video games.

I urge you to vote against the motion that violent video games should be banned. Violent video games are not a cause of violence, and they can actually have a positive impact on players. Thank you.

Here are some additional arguments against banning violent video games:

Banning violent video games would be a violation of free speech.

Banning violent video games would not stop people from playing them.

There is no evidence that violent video games cause violence.

Violent video games can actually be a way for people to express themselves and to explore different emotions.

In conclusion, I believe that violent video games should not be banned. They are not a cause of violence, and they can actually have a positive impact on players. Thank you.